ra’s avatarra’s Twitter Archive—№ 32,074

  1. @timbaldridge stackoverflow.com/questions/26746189/why-cant-generic-types-have-explicit-layout/26746274#26746274 looks like our shenanigans are explicitly prohibited by the spec. they thought of this!
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Mention ra’s avatar Mood +2 🙂
    1. …in reply to @ra
      @timbaldridge options seem to be: 1. generate types on the fly 2. pay the memory cost of non-overlapping fields
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo ra’s avatar Mood -1 🙁