ra’s avatarra’s Twitter Archive—№ 45,964

    1. …in reply to @superSGHP
      @superSGHP oh for sure. and most complexity im encountering is a result of the passage of time. the reason clojure has nine subtly different ways to define a type is its been 10 years and some of the earlier ideas were just not as good.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo ra’s avatar Mood +3 🙂
  1. …in reply to @ra
    @superSGHP i do think certain things invite chaos though. i think single dispatch, classes, interfaces, all of that is a dead end. you end up with piles of workarounds just to stay afloat and none of it is any good. clojure is full of that unfortunately.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo ra’s avatar Mood 0